Restrictions -

The protection-order proceeding follows the written notice

The legal escalation is kept in its place in the sequence.

In this entry: Tyler, cradled_filth

What the record shows

  1. The local court record identifies a July 22 protection-order proceeding. It follows the July 21 written notice to Jason and Steve.
  2. The July 23 company journal then records the order and gives staff instructions about Tyler. Those operational instructions are the next page in this feed.
  3. The timing connects these events in the chronology. Whether a particular manager directed the application is a different proposition; Steve’s later reply expressly denies having been asked for permission.

Sources (4)

  • email: July 21: explicit human-rights and retaliation notice ()
  • court: July 22: protection-order hearing record ()
  • house-call: July 23: adjoh customer-journal instructions ()
  • email: July 27: Steve's response to service of the order ()